SANKSI ADMINISTRASI BAGI WAJIB PAJAK PAJAK PENGHASILAN ORANG PRIBADI DI KOTA PADANG



Annisa Arifka

Abstract


Taxes as one of the state's sources of income, including in the field of state administration law, in this case is one of the tools that become a driving force in running the government must provide as much financial income to the State. The tax function is inseparable from tax purposes, while the tax objective is inseparable from the purpose of the country. Thus the tax objective must be aligned with the goals of the country which are the basis of the government's objectives. This research method is normative juridical, by obtaining the results that the implementation of administrative sanctions on personal income tax in the city of Padang are: administrative sanctions in the form of administrative fines of 36% (thirty six percent), administrative sanctions in the form of administrative interest of 57% (fifty-seven percent), as well as administrative sanctions in the form of administrative increases of 17% (seventeen percent). Factors causing personal income taxpayers to be subjected to administrative sanctions are due to delays caused by forgetting, because of the daily activities of taxpayers and because of frequent delays in payments, as well as a small portion who do not know about taxation and also a small part who know the time tax payment due date.


Keywords


Administrative Sanctions; Taxpayer, Income Person, Personal, Padang

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

Article Statistics

Abstract View : 0 Times
PDF (Indonesian) : 0 Downloaded

References


Bohari. (2001). Pengantar Hukum Pajak. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.

Darul Lim Octo. (2008). Pelaksanaan Sanksi Administrasi Bagi Wajib Pajak Pajak Penghasilan Orang Pribadi Di Kota Padang. Padang: Universitas Andalas.

Efendi Ibnu Susilo. (2004). Eksistensi Dan Kedudukan Pengadilan Pajak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Indoneesia. Mahkamah, 15(1), 73.

Gustian Juanda Dkk. (2003). Pajak Penghasilan Orang Pribadi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

H.S.Munawir. (2008). Perpajakan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Hanantha Bwoga. (2005). Pemeriksaan Pajak di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Laurensius Arliman S. (2016). Membangun Tata Hukum Indonesia Yang Progresif Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Hukum Yang Hakiki. Advokasi, 7(1).

Laurensius Arliman S. (2017). Fungsi Badan Kehormatan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kota Padang,. Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure, 1(2).

Laurensius Arliman S. (2018). Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Di Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum Di Indonesia. Soumatera Law Review, 1(1), 112–132.

Muqodim. (1993).Perpajakan. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Philipus M. Hadjon. (2000). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: UII Pers.

Richard Burton. (2016). Kajian Aktual Perpajakan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rukiah Handoko. (2003). Eksistensi dan Kompetensi Pengadilan Pajak. Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Bidang Kajian Hukum Pajak.

S.Munawir, V. (2003). Pajak Penghasilan Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.

Sumyar SH, M. H. (1990). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pajak Dan Perpajakan. Jakarta.

Wiratni Ahmadi. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Wajib Pajak dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak. Bandung: PT. Rafika Aditama.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Annisa Arifka

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

View My Stats