PELAKSANAAN RESTITUSI BAGI ANAK YANG MENJADI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI BENTUK PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 43 TAHUN 2017



Miszuarty Putri(1*)

(1) Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


One of the issues that is of concern to the government, experts and the public is that rape cases, especially rape crimes committed by adults to underage children, have lately caused a reaction among the community due to dissatisfaction with the criminal community dropped on the perpetrator, based on legal knowledge, the victim can claim damages / compensation or restitution to the convicted person. The problem approach method used is normative jurid, namely the law approach that is carried out on the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2017. The results of the study show that the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2017 has provided detailed arrangements for the procedure for submitting restitution and procedures granting restitution for children who are victims of criminal acts or their heirs, but there are still shortcomings that need to be refined in this government regulation concerning substitute crimes, if my / defendant / convicted convicts implement a court decision that has permanent legal force regarding the implementation of restitution. As well as it is expected that in the future the judge's decision on the granting of this restitution can be in the form of additional criminal sanctions in addition to the principal penalty in the form of imprisonment and fine.


Keywords


Retitution, Chaildren, Victim, Delict.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Andika Wijaya, W. P. A. (2016). Darurat Kejahatan Seksual, Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum dan Ganti Kerugian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Arief, B. N. (2014a). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Arief, B. N. (2014b). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan. Semarang: Universitas Dipenegoro Perss.

Fuady, M. (2013). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Pendekatan Kontemporer. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gosita, A. (1985). Masalah Perlindungan Anak, Kedudukan Korban Di Dalam Tindak Pidana. Jakarta: Akademika Presindo.

Gosita, A. (2003). Perlindungan Anak. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Hamzah, A. (2009). Terminologi Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hamzah, A. (2012). Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Perkembangannya. Medan: PT. Sofmedia.

Huda, C. (2008). Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan” Menuju Kepada “Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalah” Tinjauan Kriti s terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertangungjawabn Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Laurensius Arliman S. (2016). Penegakan Hukum dan Kesadaran Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Muladi. (2002). Hak Asasi Manusia Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Prodjodikoro, W. (2000). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum, Dipandang Dari Sudut Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Saragih, B. R. (2006). Politik Hukum. Bandung: CV. Utomo.

Sry Wahyuni, H. C. (2018). Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 4(1), 117–128.

Sunaryo, S. (2004). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Yunas, D. N. (1992). Konsepsi Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Angkasa Raya.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Miszuarty Putri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

Web Analytics View My Stats