PERAN PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI PADANG KELAS IA DALAM MEMBERIKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERKARA PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA



Rustan Sinaga

Abstract


After the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, the implication of handling disputes disputes becomes the authority of the Industrial Relations Court at the local District Court. In addition to the court (litigation) settlement disputes termination disputes may also be settled out of court (non litigation). The Industrial Relations Court at the IA District Court handled several termination matters. In this study the authors will focus on the settlement through the judiciary (litigation). The problems discussed in this paper is the Role of Industrial Relations Court in Providing Legal Certainty to Termination of Employment Case (PHK) and Implementation of Decision. This study is juridical normative. Based on this research the authors draw the conclusion that the Industrial Relations Court has not played a role in Giving Legal Certainty to Termination Employment Case. The Industrial Relations Court only performs its role in accordance with applicable law. Implementation of the PHI's decision that the losing party tended to file a cassation appeal. Parties that have not / do not want to implement the contents of the decision of the IRC are caused by the absence of sanctions in Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower and Law Number 2 Year 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement.


Keywords


PHI; District Court Class IA Padang; Legal certainty; Work termination

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

Article Statistics

Abstract View : 0 Times
PDF (Indonesian) : 0 Downloaded

References


Anwar, Saiful. 1991. Sendi-Sendi Hubungan Pekerja Dengan Pengusaha. Medan: Kelompok Studi Hukum dan Masyarakat.

Arliman S, Laurensius. 2018. “Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum di Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum di Indonesia.” Soumatera Law Review1(1): 112. http://ejournal.kopertis10.or.id/index.php/soumlaw/article/view/3346.

F.X Djumialdji. 2005. Perjanjian Kerja. Jakarta: Sinar grafika Offset.

Gultom, A. Ridwan Halim dan Sri Subiandini. 1987. Sari Hukum Perburuhan Aktual. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.

H. Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani. 2013. Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Diseratsi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Husni, Lalu. 2001. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ibrahim, Jhonny. 2010. Penulis dalam karya tulis ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh pendekatan yuridis empiris . Menurut Jhony Ibrahim “Penelitian hukum yuridis normatif adalah tipe penelitian yang difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-ka. Malang: PT Bayu Media Publishing.

Khakim, Abdul. 2003. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Lilik Mulyadi, Agus Subroto. 2011. Penyelesaian Perkara Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2008. Penemuan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2017. Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Pangaribuan, Juanda. 2017. Seluk Beluk Hukum Acara Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Jakarta: MISI.

Pujiyo, Ugo dan. 2012. Hukum Acara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Rusli, Hardijan. 2004. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

S, R. Joni Bambang. 2013. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Sastrohadiwiryo, B. Siswanto. 2005. Manajemen tenaga kerja Indonesia, Pendekatan Administrasi dan Operasional. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Akasara.

Sitorus, Thoga M. 2007. Thoga M. Sitorus, Masalah Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia dan Daerah Pasca Reformasi, Bina Media Perintis, Medan, 2007, hlm.73. 1. Medan: ina Media Perintis.

Soepomo, Imam. 2016. Hukum Perburuhan Bidang Hubungan Kerja. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. 2004. “Implementasi gugatan Legal Standing Dan Class Action dalam Praktik Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum26(11).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Rustan Sinaga

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

View My Stats