PEMERIKSAAN PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN GANTI KERUGIAN DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KELAS 1B BUKITTINGGI



Rianda Prima Putri

Abstract


Basically, compensation is a civil case. However, once the criminal law law is applied, compensation can be made in conjunction with a criminal case. Although claims of merger compensation in a criminal case have been written in criminal law, this type of case is hardly found in court. This research proposes to answer 3 (three) problems related to the implementation of the merger claims for compensation (1) the conduct of examination of the merger claims for compensation in a criminal case in Class I Court of B Bukittinggi; (2) judges' consideration in making decisions in cases where compensation is combined with a criminal case in Class I Court of B Bukittinggi; (3) obstacles in conducting examination of merger claims for compensation in a criminal case in Class I Court of B Bukittinggi. obstacles encountered in the implementation of the merger of the indemnification lawsuits in the criminal case at the IB Negeri Bukittinggi State Court are: a) Lack of public knowledge; b) have made a peace effort by replacing all losses suffered by the victim (material loss); c) Judge's consideration of the economic level of the defendant who has been sued for damages by the plaintiff or victim; d) Plaintiff or victim must be able to prove the total loss he or she has suffered.


Keywords


merger case, compensation, claim

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

Article Statistics

Abstract View : 0 Times
PDF (Indonesian) : 0 Downloaded

References


Abdi, Eko Riyadi dan Supriyanto. 2007. No Title. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. et al. 2006. “Membangun Konstitusionalitas Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi3(4): 2–203.

Bernard L. Tanya, Yoan N. Simanjuntak dan Markus Y. Hage. 2010. Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Ebeson, Jonas & Okowa, Phoebe (ed.). 2009. Environmental Law and Justice in Context, London: Oxford Press.

Husni, Anang. 2003. “Fumgsi Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hak Masyarakat.” Universitas Indonesia.

Ismansyah. 2000. “Pidana Ganti Rugi Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana (Suatu Kajian Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana),.” Makalah Hukum, Fakultas Hukum UNAND.

Leden Marpaung. 2007.Proses Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dan Rehabilitasi Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2007. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Napang, Marthen. 2008. Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Tenaga Listrik. Makasar: Yustisia Press.

Poernomo, Bambang. 2003.Pola Dasar Teori-Asas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana Dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Rosidah, Nikmah. 2014. “Pembaharuan Ide Deversi Dalam Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kompilasi1(1).

S, Laurensius Arliman. 2017a. “Hukum Pidana Sebagai Landasan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Penegak Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jendela Hukum dan Keadilan4(2).

———. 2017b. “Kedudukan Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Anak Yang Berkelanjutan Di Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica14(1).

———. 2017c. “Komnas HAM Sebagai State Auxiliary Bodies Di Dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Jendela Hukum dan Keadilan4(1).

Saifullah. 2010. Refleksi Sosiologi Hukum. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Saleh, K. Wantjik. 2001.Hukum Acara Perdata RBG/HIR. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Samekto, FX. Adji. 2015. “Normativas Keilmuan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Aliran Pemikiran Neo-Kantian.pdf.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum44(1).

Syafi, M. 2012. “Instrumentasi Hukum Ham , Pembentukan Lembaga Perlindungan Ham Di Indonesia Dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi.”Masalah-Masalah Hukum44(1).

Waluyo, Bambang. 2002. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Soumatera Law Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2620-5904

View My Stats